Jump to content
Forum rules

Excalibur!

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    4504

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Excalibur!

  2. Posted

    9 minutes ago, 悲しい春 said:

    That's the thing, if you start the nerf circle, there has to be a gun that becomes dominant over the other. A test district, as mentioned by the user you've quoted, would be fantastic to test out the issues people have with some guns.

    I find that the NTEC's current state is a nice balance point, from which on other guns are supposed to be buffed and/or nerfed. It's supposed to be the most versatile gun and most played gun, like the AK in CS (IMO)

    The Scout part, as I've made a post on it as well, I disagree on. A compromise would be to make it like in CS, but that would be essentially the same thing just a bit worse.

    The HVR, on the damage part you're 100% right, heck I'd even try out 720dmg, like in the old high ttk servers. You have a point on the noscoping part as well. You can noscope to extreme ranges, nerfing it by making the crosshair bigger (a.k.a decreasing crouching accuracy as mentioned), would be interesting to play test at least.

     

     

    Another one that brings cs to apb? That game only reduces to who pulls awp first and thats why i quited it.

  3. Posted

    Just now, GhosT said:

     

    Finally someone that knows what he's talking about.

    In my opinion, the N-TEC kills too fast at most ranges, and should be slowed down a little bit by lowering the recovery time.

    Then balance all the weak guns around it so they're comparable to the N-TEC, and not just flat-out weaker.

     

    I fear that if we balance guns around the current N-TEC, we'll be having tons of weapons that kill incredibly fast with little time to react and outgun your opponent.

     

     

     

    If you'd buff every weapon in APB to be in the same line as the N-TEC, you'll have a game with guns that kill incredibly fast with no time to react and outgun your opponent, sort of what call of duty is.

    So yeah, lets every gun a ntec and make the game BORING. Really good idea!!!

     

    Its imposible to get killed as fast as you mention at more than 40m with the current character speed and cover you can get. If you get killed all the time by ntec at that kind of range, then its really  a SKILL issue.

  4. Posted

    Just now, GhosT said:

    Excuse me, what's wrong with you? You keep twisting arguments and make up things I've never mentioned. Why is it suddenly a skill problem?

    I don't even know how many times I have to explain you what's wrong with the N-TEC.

    At this point you're either incapable of reading and understanding things, or you're just trolling.

     

     

    Again, versatile doesn't mean overpowered.

    Theres are a few versatile weapons in APB that compare to the N-TEC, some of these are the FAR, the S1-FA, or the STAR. The N-TEC is better than them in every way.

    Why is a skill problem? You need to check what players mostly complain about guns or ask for nerfs in the first place.

     

    Thats why you ask for buffs and not nerfs, if you feel that a gun is weaker than other in the same category you should ask for a buff, not a nerf.

  6. Posted · Edited by Ken2

    8 minutes ago, MrM0dZ said:

    i got MVP on baylan FC yesterday using a stock STAR 556,your argument is not valid bro

     

    And so i did, i removed the pic... but i have an older one. Thats why you cant say ntec its OP when you can do well with any gun if you know what you are doing.

     

    You didnt get my point anyways.

  7. Posted

    4 minutes ago, GhosT said:

     

    Haven't been silver since 2011, nor have I ever been crying for nerfs. The only guns I complained about have been nerfed and have never been reverted.

    Now what's your point on that picture? Of course a good player will be demolishing others with a good weapon.

     

    That's not what I'm asking for, and that's literally what the problem of the N-TEC is.

    Is not a problem, you yourself agreed that being versatile doesnt mean its op. In good hands can be troubly, yes, but it can be outplayed at any range by any gun. it doesnt EXCELS at nothing.

    Nerfing its quality will get a pop drop just like the last time its been nerfed and rebuffed once again.

  8. Posted

    3 minutes ago, DouglasFalcon said:

    That's exactly the wrong thing with N-TEC tho, lmao

    If you are outguned by ntec at cqc while you are using pointman, you have skill problems. If you are outgunned at mid range against ntec using oscar or carabine, you have skills problems. If you are outgunned by ntec at long range while using most marksman or sniper guns, you have skill problems.

     

    Notice that not every gun is able to just go outside in an open area and just take down anyone. For example obir requires you get cover all the time, its amazing for pop up/corner to corner fights.

  9. Posted

    1 minute ago, GhosT said:

    Don't even try to balance out other weapons by equipping a secondary, when the N-TEC doesn't need one to begin with.

    Why are you suddenly bringing in the most situational weapons in the game?

     

    That is true, there are a few versatile all-range weapons in the game, but the N-TEC is a straight upgrade to all of those.

    You can't make every weapon work at every range. The less we need are pointman guns outguning nhvrs at 90m... you are ridiculous.

    • Like 1

  10. Posted

    IMPOSSIBLE to reason with a silver that just limits himself to cry nerf a single weapon for YEARS and when its done, it gets reversed in no time because people realize that the gun it may be not as good or people who are good still doing well with it despise the nerf like it can be show in this IMAGE:

    JKFSTMv.jpg

    Post nerf, cj3, no hs3.

     

    Its not the size of the gun its the player using it...

  11. Posted · Edited by Ken2

    5 minutes ago, GhosT said:

     

    I think you fail to understand that none of these weapons are as versatile as the N-TEC.

    Yes they are. Even if they wouldnt, you can cover its weaknesses with your secondary, as any experienced player DOES?

    Do you know that there are other elements appart of a primary weapon to play the game and kill enemies???

     

    Do you forget about opgl and osmaw can kill 1 hit?

     

  13. Posted

    1 minute ago, GhosT said:

    STAR doesn't compete as it's slower, deals less damage and has a slower recovery time.

    ATAC can't do much against the N-TEC on range.

    Carbine is the same as the ATAC, it's mostly a CQC weapon.

    Ursus is slower than the N-TEC in both fire rate and accuracy recovery.

    Obeya can only stand it's ground at higher ranges, the N-TEC can easily outgun it.

     

    None of these weapons are good at 0m up to 60m, they only fill their own roles within these ranges, and become way worse than the N-TEC out of their designed range.

    Boy you are so wrong...

    Star, yes it does.

    Atac, if you learn to use it, yes it does.

    Carabine destroys anything up to 50m if you dont find quick cover.

    Ursus need 5 bullets and with irl3 is an obeya upgrade... god if used that gun.

    Obeya can destroy an ntec 50m+, i use it with cj3 all the time, and every time i use this gun it doesnt matter who is in the other team they would run instantly to find cover.

    Oscar, check the vid posted...

     

    Stop embarassing yourself, its all about gameplay, enviroment and tactics. You can outperform ANY gun playing properly. This is not cod or cs, stop pulling your favourite games balances into apb.

  14. Posted · Edited by Ken2

    13 minutes ago, MartisLTU said:

    Semi weapons should get fix/nerf .... some how semi weapons like "oscar" shoots faster than full auto rife + no need to zoomin to get same range or accuracy as zoom in and focused ntec ...oh and dont forget this crazy mobility to dodge bullets while shooting ....

    Example: 0:27 sec. 1:56 sec.

     

     

    In real life and other games semi weapons are slower than auto rifes and reques same focus zoom in as any rife.

     

     

    Oh god, how could i forget about oscar, its the most painful gun in the game atm.

  15. Posted

    12 minutes ago, GhosT said:

    I don't just think of nerfing.

    I think about balance, and honestly, as far as I can remember, all the weapons I have mentioned to be overperforming the past years have been nerfed.

     

    That's where you're wrong. Most of the firefights happen with cover. The N-TEC is very powerful with and without cover on both ends.

    Name me one weapon that is as good as the N-TEC in close range, mid range, and high range.

     

    Star, atac, carabine, ursus, obeya (killed plenty of good cqc, even pointmans), cobra, issr...

    And you can keep adding weapons if you use your secondaries and tactics, aka gameplay, not raw "its op nerf".

     

    AxirCEM.png

  16. Posted

    Just now, GhosT said:

    How is that even an argument? That wasn't one of my points to begin with, I was just explaining to you how the N-TEC works at ranges.

    It's still one of the best weapons, and the most versatile weapons, without IR3.

     

     

    Yeah, I am aware. I haven't seen a single useful post of him in the past years.

    I'm honestly just doing it to talk about the N-TEC.

    Versatile, yes, it doesn't really excels at nothing unless a guy is in running in an open area.

  18. Posted

    1 minute ago, GhosT said:

    You are aware that the N-TEC starts to drop off at 50m, right? So that's not the ideal range it was initially made for. It only extends by 7m if you equip IR3.

    How many times do I have to explain the issue to you? Yes, other assault rifles or SMGs outperform the N-TEC under that range. But the N-TEC is perfectly capable of defending itself in such scenarios, while STILL being able to be very lethal at other ranges.

    You can equip ir3 to ANY weapon, how many times do you need to find an excuse to spit nerf ntec?

  19. Posted

    13 minutes ago, Skjaeg said:

    yeah because obviously you with the less popular opinion is clearly correct and all knowing, while GhosT who agrees with literally everyone other than you just has no clue about anything, obviously you just arent as great at apb with the ntec as you think

    That plenty of silvers that see a scripie gold using ntec, it doesnt mean the gun is OP. It doesnt mean that they dont take enough care to practice with it and cry is op means they are right.

  21. Posted

    Just now, GhosT said:

    The ursus deals just enough damage to kill in 5 shots. If your enemy has Clotting Agent 3, you will often require 6 shots to kill him. it's also suffering more recoil and isn't as fast as the N-TEC. It's not as versatile as the N-TEC, especially in close quarters.

     

     

    What range are you talking about?

    40-50m is the range where the N-TEC really shines when tap fired, and the ATAC isn't effective at that range at all.

     

    Ursus completly outgun a ntec at more than 50m range... its a full auto obeya.

  23. Posted

    Just now, GhosT said:

    The ATAC is more suited for close quarters, probably around 30m.

    The STAR isn't as accurate as the N-TEC.

    Carbine is also more of a close quarters weapon.

     

    All of these will loose to an N-TEC player in an open area, when engaged at the same time.

    Unless the N-TEC player doesn't know how to play it.

    You can't be serious... ntec winning an atac in an open area? What?

×
×
  • Create New...