TheMessiah 430 Posted October 28, 2019 Quote We were successful in identifying 2 Game Loop sections (out of 35) where APB 2.1 ran a total of 4.5ms slower than APB 1.20. so i was expecting news about that but nothing..how many out of 35 are done? (sry for making another topic like this but cant ask otherwise) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kevkof 806 Posted October 28, 2019 Not sure what you're wondering about, but what he's referring to is that out of the 35 sections 2 were identified to be running slower on the newer engine. (in the older update) I also believe that this is part of the update on that specific segment of the post: Quote There are a million things that could render this benchmark invalid, and I know on the surface this looks like APB 2.1 is now running slightly faster than APB 1.20, but we'll need more performance tests off SPCT machines to really assess where we are. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TheMessiah 430 Posted October 28, 2019 My point was..this 2 game loop sections are the only slower they find or they gonna look in rest 33 from now on?All 35 are already checked and this 2 are the only bad or they gonna start searchin in rest from now on..thats what i mean Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kevkof 806 Posted October 28, 2019 [This is just how I read it, not sure if correct] First lets start by getting that full part of the text, not just that one sentence. Quote For the rest of the week, we iterated on this process to improve our stat collection system and dig deeper into specific chunks of the Game Loop so that we could directly compare the performance of those smaller sections between Live and the Engine Upgrade. We were successful in identifying 2 Game Loop sections (out of 35) where APB 2.1 ran a total of 4.5ms slower than APB 1.20. To me this says that they spent the rest of that week doing similar tests over and over to improve the data they get and what they can read from that. They got to a point where they could compare 1.20 and 2.1 section by section, which would mean that those 2 sections mentioned are the only ones of those 35 that were slower. It could be that further improvements can be made in some sections, but I'm not sure if those would be worth the hassle they would likely be to sort out. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hexerin 1140 Posted October 28, 2019 4 hours ago, TheMessiah said: My point was..this 2 game loop sections are the only slower they find or they gonna look in rest 33 from now on?All 35 are already checked and this 2 are the only bad or they gonna start searchin in rest from now on..thats what i mean All 35 are done. 2 showed issues. They're working towards fixing those issues now. The only way the post could mean something other than this is if MattScott doesn't understand basic English grammar. Unlikely. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TheMessiah 430 Posted October 28, 2019 6 hours ago, Kevkof said: They got to a point where they could compare 1.20 and 2.1 section by section, which would mean that those 2 sections mentioned are the only ones of those 35 that were slower. told the same..ok thx Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
