Jump to content

MrLek

Members
  • Content Count

    91
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by MrLek


  1. 22 minutes ago, BlatMan said:

    https://www.gamersfirst.com/apb/news/2019/8/29/message-from-matt

     

    First Paragraph:

    "In August, Little Orbit reached terms to sell the APB IP to a company in Hong Kong named Unit Game."

     

    Here's Unit Game's website. It has no content except for the APB RTW trailer.

    https://unitgame.com/index.html

    Really, really weird. Now all the chips are down. Now it's all cleared up. Since 2019 and no news from "APB Mobile". 

    Why didn't Frosi ask Matt Scott any of this at the AMA?

    We had a chance to corner Matt Scott in the AMA, but it went down the drain.

    Man... I really didn't know this stuff, I'm pretty pissed right now, the reality is APB is never going to get better with this company. Unless they change all the employees, including Matt Scott.

    What is your opinion about the company Little Orbit?

    • Thanks 1

  2. 35 minutes ago, Mercedeez said:

    so i've been thinking about this for a long time now. most people think the name apb is cursed and reminds everyone of bad things, what if we change the name of apb to something else? like "apb reloaded reloaded" to signify the launch of this new engine. i put a poll so please vote and comment on ur ideas.

    The problem is not in the name, it's in the bad management.


  3. 2 hours ago, glaciers said:

    little orbit already sold it to an obscure chinese “developer” years ago

    Where does this "Chinese developer" fit in here?

    Why does no one have more information about this "Chinese developer"?

    Sorry for so many questions, it's because they say so many mixed things here on the forum, without foot or head and I just try to put the parts together to understand.

    I've seen people talk a lot about this "Chinese developer", but what they basically say is this, that he bought the Ip. There is nothing else?

    Please, if you know more information about this "Chinese developer" talk here and show the source of the information.
    I don't mean to be rude here, but it turns out that this just seems like a fallacy to try to discredit the L.O.

    Very little information and without any evidence, nobody shows anything truly compromising and with proofs.

     

    edit: Frosi was supposed to have asked about this "Chinese developer" at the AMA.    :/

    • Like 1

  4. 1 - What is the possibility of a company buying the APB?
    2 - Would the possibility increase if the APB closed?
    3 -How much is the APB currently worth?

    4 - How much would a company offer to buy the APB?
    5 - What kind of company would buy APB these days?
    6 - A large, medium or small company?

    7 - Do you know companies open to buy games? quote.

    8 - Why doesn't L.O put the APB up for sale? Since L.O is not able to keep it.

    9 - What is your opinion about Little Orbit?

     

    Sorry so many questions. The last:
    10 - Excuse my ignorance, but would selling a game be "similar" to selling a football player, put a price and play on the market?

     

    edit:

    11 - Is it worth buying the APB?

     


  5. 8 hours ago, Bellenettiel said:

    im stuck on the gold empire comment

     

    sounds hella metal
    like some sort of army of midas touched warriors marching to waterfront to take our boats

     

    jokes apart, i think this project is cursed at this point, still think LO are alright... its just that the guys before were too greedy and too late.

    When I say "gold empire", i mean hackers who are evidently mostly in gold.


  6. I honestly have mixed feelings about APB's issues. I can't have a concrete opinion about his problems.

    There are so many things, you are right to complain about so much time without anything, matchmaking, hackers, toxicity, among other things. However, the company has reasons for not having done anything all this time, few employees, problems with old codes, failed attempts (APB 2.1, APB 2.2), among other things.

    I hope this next year will be a good one, according to what was discussed at the AMA with Matt Scott.
    But some of you here on the forum are changing my opinion about this company. We could play in peace if "simple" problems were solved quickly like matchmaking, chat toxicity, active GM's, hackers, among other things.

    • Like 2

  7. 18 minutes ago, LilyRain said:

    Imagine an option in Counter Strike that lets players switch off Smoke Grenades and Flash Bangs.

    Fairness will only exist if smoke is either visible or doesn't exist for EVERYONE.

    We don't have bombs in the APB that have the function of raising smoke or blinding people. So there's no way to compare.

    The function of the bomb in APB is just to take damage. You can see the red nick of the enemy passing by. They could make the enemy's red nick bigger.


  8. 1 hour ago, R3ACT3M said:

    Anything that makes visibility easier should not be allowed to be changed

    I don't think this is unfair, you could ask L.O to put the option to remove the smoke within the APB options, it would be more democratic. Whoever wanted to play with smoke would activate the option, who had a bad PC and wanted to play with a little more FPS would deactivate it.


  9. On 12/23/2022 at 5:19 PM, glaciers said:

    Eu suspeito que é daí que vem a diferença de opinião

     

    não considero a pequena órbita meus amigos ou minha família, não importa quanto tempo e dinheiro eu gaste no apb, eles são uma empresa que oferece um produto aos clientes (eu) para ganhar dinheiro - se estou satisfeito com o produto, então eu pago em dinheiro, se não estou satisfeito então não pago em dinheiro


    fingir unilateralmente que o relacionamento é algo diferente de negócios é muito tolo, mas isso depende de você

    I'm not talking about relationship.

     

    Merged.

     

    On 12/23/2022 at 5:19 PM, glaciers said:

    i suspect this is where the difference of opinion comes from

     

    i do not consider little orbit my friends or my family no matter how much time and money i spend on apb, they are a business offering a product to customers (me) in order to make money - if i'm satisfied with the product then i pay money, if i'm not satisfied then i do not pay money


    to one-sidedly pretend the relationship is anything other than business is very foolish imo, but that's up to you

    I understand your revolt.

    • Like 1

  10. 7 minutes ago, glaciers said:

    would you keep going to a restaurant that gave you bad food every time if the chef told you he was trying his best? 

    A game is more work than a meal.

    You are the chef's son and you just want lunch, the chef tries to make a full lunch but his own kitchen doesn't have all the ingredients for it, he tries again but again he doesn't have all the ingredients for it and not enough staff . Then he really starts to prepare just a lunch which is what you need. In the future, it will be stabilized enough to give you a full lunch.

    The APB is not prepared for a big jump.

    • Like 2

  11. 13 hours ago, NotZombieBiscuit said:

    Don't bother vsb. You can't teach these people.

    I don't understand the most technical subject, but anyway I have my right to express my opinion, even when I don't understand it... Many people will identify with my opinion, so I'm not just speaking for myself, and I might as well be speaking for many people who do not open the forum.

     

    The fact is the following: Years have passed and what we have now does not match the time that has passed.

     

    Here's my take: This doesn't mean Little Orbit didn't try anything, it doesn't mean they spent all these years doing nothing. They tried great things.

     

    So in my opinion they are seeing now that the problem is at the root, to achieve something big they went back to the root (APB 1.30) to solve it.
    Perhaps you yourself do not know the problems, as do I and many other people.

    I'm being honest here, I don't know what you work for, if you're a programmer, game developer, etc. Anyway, don't misunderstand my comments. You can take into consideration some points of what I said.

    • Like 1

  12. Why are some people criticizing Little Orbit's work?
    L.O wanted a big update, they tried APB 2.1 and APB 2.2, but APB has a lot of problems and once again they tried something, only they had to go to the root of the problems, they went back a lot, APB 1.30. But L.O took years to understand that, because APB 2.1 and APB 2.2 were not worked on in a short time, it took a long time to work on both, good thing, they didn't give up, and a lot of people still criticize... L.O could have closed the APB a long time ago, but they didn't give up. The attempt of APB 2.1 and APB 2.2 served to show L.O where the error really was. 

    Because just like us, they also thought big, but the reality is this: The APB has problems at the roots, in order to dream big we have to solve the problem at the roots, so that it can grow. We cannot treat this with the view we currently have on the problem, we detected the problem after many failed attempts, we learn from the mistakes...

    • Like 1

  13. 1 hour ago, NotTheEnforcer said:

    1) Pequena órbita.
    2) A Gamersfirst foi comprada pela LO.
    3) Sim. Eles poderiam parar todo o trabalho amanhã, se quisessem.

    4) E eles? Eles não existem mais como uma entidade.

    5) Ver 4.

    6) Eles têm. Gamersfirst ainda é usado como um endereço homônimo.

     

    Espero que responda tudo.

    Why are some people criticizing Little Orbit's work?
    L.O wanted a big update, they tried APB 2.1 and APB 2.2, but APB has a lot of problems and once again they tried something, only they had to go to the root of the problems, they went back a lot, APB 1.30. But L.O took years to understand that, because APB 2.1 and APB 2.2 were not worked on in a short time, it took a long time to work on both, good thing, they didn't give up, and a lot of people still criticize... L.O could have closed the APB a long time ago, but they didn't give up. The attempt of APB 2.1 and APB 2.2 served to show L.O where the error really was. 

    Because just like us, they also thought big, but the reality is this: The APB has problems at the roots, in order to dream big we have to solve the problem at the roots, so that it can grow. We cannot treat this with the view we currently have on the problem, we detected the problem after many failed attempts, we learn from the mistakes...

    • Thanks 1

  14. On 16/12/2022 at 11:55, R3ACT3M said:

    Só não deixe as pessoas editarem as configurações. Bloqueie os arquivos e só permita que as configurações sejam alteradas no jogo através do menu de configurações. Algo como uma seção de configuração avançada de usuários. Portanto, se o jogador PRECISA ajustar esses arquivos para obter estabilidade ou desempenho extra, o LittleOrbit já terá feito isso e se certificará de que essas configurações não tenham efeito sobre se um jogador tem ou não vantagem em usá-los fora do desempenho e estabilidade (coisas como remoção de bonecas de pano, fumaça de granada e flash de focinho são exemplos de efeitos que não devem ser desativados)

    There are many people who play with lousy computers, and removing the fog, removing the quality of the weapon skins, removing the light from the shots, removing some particles from spray missions, etc., end up helping to gain a little more FPS.


  15. 1 - Who owns APB Reloaded? Gamersfirst or Little Orbit?
    2 - Who owns Gamersfirst?
    3 - Does Little Orbit have full rights to do whatever they want with APB?
    4 - What about Gamersfirst?
    5 - What is the use of Gamersfirst?
    6 - Why doesn't Little Orbit pass all Gamersfirst games into its name?


  16. Em 12/06/2022 em 00:05, MattScott disse:

    “Como nativo de NA, não posso deixar de enfatizar o quanto a consolidação significaria para mim e para todos os jogadores de NA. Eu também acho que ser capaz de continuar jogando com seus personagens principais de NA pode trazer mais do que alguns jogadores de Jericho de volta.”  - Membro da comunidade

     

    Ainda outra coisa que poderia ter sido um grande fator quando se trata de impedir que os jogadores saíssem, o que também foi divulgado com várias postagens no blog e eventualmente descartado/adiado até que algum tipo de atualização do mecanismo acontecesse.

     

    Aqui está a pergunta simples, isso ainda está planejado no futuro? Os jogadores de NA desejam jogar em sua rede, que infelizmente estão presos em um servidor que é basicamente impossível de jogar a maior parte do dia, alguns deles só querem projetar e vender seus trabalhos também, mas não podem realmente fazer isso devido à falta de jogadores em NA e o mercado está basicamente morto.Entendemos que LO adiou isso para tentar desenvolver uma solução que tornesse a nomenclatura justa para que as pessoas não percassem seus nomes como parte da fusão, no entanto, NA provavelmente morrerá completamente nos próximos meses, já que a população geral dos jogos em ambos os servidores continue a diminuir e alguns jogadores simplesmente não têm vontade de nivelar um novo personagem na UE ou simplesmente não têm os slots de personagem para fazê-lo.

    Let me get this straight... Is Matt Scott, CEO of L.O, saying that Jericho is going to die in 3 months?


  17. On 23/11/2022 at 12:03, HeY0 said:

    Olá a todos,

     

    Com o patch de hoje, estou recebendo o seguinte erro e o jogo não pode ser iniciado.

    Quais são suas sugestões de solução?

     

    obrigada

    nm1m7z6.png

     

     

    I am also having this problem after this update. I hope they fix this.

×
×
  • Create New...