MrLek
-
Content Count
91 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by MrLek
-
-
17 minutes ago, Yapopal said:Why do you think the division of districts is something bad and dangerous?
Simple: It didn't work so they took it out.
We're not talking about something punitive like an anti cheat, the easy anti cheat will come back but that's a totally different subject of matchmaking, it doesn't mean that the easy anti cheat didn't work.
We are talking about a game dynamic, which is much broader and is not restricted to cheaters, but to ALL players.
So about that, in my opinion, L.O should optimize matchmaking very carefully, without major drastic changes, slowly, and slowly, until it reaches perfection.
Bearing in mind that this is a very broad subject.
-
On 3/1/2023 at 9:39 PM, FanFoehver said:Hey everyone! This post is about suggesting new behaviors for Traffic AI logic, including sidewalk pedestrians, and AI drivers' logic.
I will start first!
1. New hostile Pedestrian behavior: When AI is antagonized or being shot at (not hearing gunshots) AI proceeds to throw 8-balls or bricks at the shooter (or any possible way to fight back) against the shooter.
2. Driver Random Emergency Response: AI traffic always gets stuck when someone collides with them, or shoots directly at their vehicles. In this case, AI needs to have a timer to make a decision, one of their random decisions should be:
A. Get the hell out of here ASAP (Floor it!)
B. Get out of the vehicle and run away!
C. Stay in the vehicle and Panic for a bit! (Like they usually do, but not stay there forever!).
D. Run over the shooter, and escape!
After the timer checks if it is okay to return to normal driving behavior, then AI will continue driving normally, Or go to the despawner (Underground parking zone).
3. AI Criminal Behavior: AI will very rarely steal items from the stores, only Enforcers will be able to arrest them. On the other hand, Criminals will be able to use Criminal AI to assist them in moving heavy items, bags etc. to make missions a bit easier, this tactic may not work on all Peds!.
I think that's all what AI needs. This may sound too much, but it won't hurt someone to make some suggestions!
Bring yours below!
That's not the focus of the game, so it's not worth dedicating work to it.
• In fact, the APB is already ready, just optimize it on several fronts in what it already proposes.
- Matchmaking, Anti-cheat, a new contact, maybe new content to buy in the G1C store (I don't think there's much there, despite the huge amount of weapons, maybe a new outfit or a new car).
I don't think APB needs any more updates outside of the subjects i mentioned. The APB in my opinion is quite free-to-play, i think that L.O can now relax.- And a more decent tutorial, of course.
-
15 hours ago, Yapopal said:It is necessary to divide the districts. As it was before.
This is dangerous O.O
I don't want something like that. I'm silver.
The community has already given very interesting ideas on this subject (matchmaking).
For example, in a post i made, i rambled a lot, i was just fed up with this matchmaking subject so i decided to "contribute" in some way, even though i rambled a lot. So in this post there was an interesting comment, it was this:
Not to mention the numerous publications that exist on this subject here within the forum. So i suppose there are also many interesting ideas that just need to be applied by L.O.
And that's exactly it, ideas need to be applied, otherwise they would just be ideas. And L.O is wasting very interesting ideas from the community.
-
11 hours ago, NotZombieBiscuit said:I never said anything about how they are not cheating or cheating.
Just want to see someone fire a gun faster than its fire rate that can't be done even with cheats.
Bro... I really have a feeling that hackers have decreased in number with this update. It could be that hackers have become few in relation to the total number of players online. I may be rambling, but I have this impression.
About this issue of criticizing golds and putting them in the same box as hackers, I think it's idiotic. I respect the golds a lot, they have experience, those who tend to criticize are those who actually harm their own team, because the one who criticizes is usually that player who goes AFK, or leaves the game and leaves the rest of the team alone.In many times those who criticize are hypocrite - Wait a minute...others can't do these things wrong, but can you? just to satisfy your ego?
Besides, the one who usually criticizes is a mule, on strategic issues, but those who are older know that this is not a taboo or a myth, you really get used to the APB strategy which is easy to discern.
For example: identifying where enemies will spawn, use map elements to your advantage, covering, knowing how to position yourself on the map, locations that favor the team, etc. Just think of the best for the team, these simple things that make the difference and that many of these guys who criticize do not have the ability to think. Its really simple things that get into your vein and that becomes automatic, but it seems that we have to state the obvious to these people who criticize.It's the guys who play OCA and come in shooting, wasting bullets like crazy, and when the match is over, this guy blames all the enemies calling them a hacker, but he was the one who harmed the team.
I'm not being a teacher, or wanting to teach anyone. I just want to say that those who criticize are actually those who harm someone, and that at the end of the story they pass for spoiled victims. Hackers have always existed and will never be spared criticism, but don't confuse HACKER with GOLD. Admit you're dumb and your head starts to hurt and heat up when you start thinking about strategies. Of course I'm exaggerating and being ironic, but they don't think out of laziness anyway.
Sorry for the big text, i got carried away. I ended up venting, because sometimes I go through these situations. You do your best in the match, doing everything I mentioned above, while the other guys on the team are criticizing in chat and rushing with OCA or NHVR like crazy without thinking. Yes... this happens a lot, people rushing with a sniper at close range and then criticizing the opposing team in chat.
edit: I don't mean you NotZombieBiscuit XD, I just supplemented.
-
42 minutes ago, MattScott said:Getting to this a tad late, but its a holiday here in the US, so I have some free time.
I've been pretty upfront about the APB 2.x effort. No amount of Player Help would have saved it. The issues were purely technical, and the game was never going to run well. So we scrapped it to start over with 1.30. Now that 1.30 is Live, everything is back on the table. I will be posting a Roadmap soon for both new features and content.
I get flooded with PMs on the forums and Discord - mostly players wanting help with their bans. My customer service team does an absolutely heroic job dealing with those, and I stay out of their way. I don't over turn bans. But if players want to offer help, then you're welcome to reach out and I'll do my best to respond.Thanks Matt Scott D; D; D;
Our dear APB rose from the ashes
-
1
-
-
12 minutes ago, Sergsininia said:Or we could institute a name filter... then offensive names can be blocked, at least slurs and hate speech...
I don't think there should be something like that. Everyone has their own understanding of what is offensive. It could happen that L.O put in the future a very rigid filter that would be annoying. For example: if I put a nickname like this -- "Yourmotherisabitch". I could have created this nickname just to joke, but I can be an honest player. But in fact there should be a filter for nicknames that refer to Nazism, ra...pe, incest, etc. These really heavy and indisputable things.
This idea of yours is good, it could be something to be discussed. In my opinion it wouldn't change much, the problem is the bad attitudes of the players, I think the nick doesn't match their attitudes.
-
On 2/19/2023 at 12:43 AM, Maddalic said:Hand weapons (knives, tasers, etc); basically just to BM on campers you sneak up on
Edit all of that and erase everything you wrote. APB already has a taser.
On 2/19/2023 at 12:43 AM, Maddalic said:Enforce a code of conduct in-game (no hateful names [IHateLGBT and fuckr-tards are just two I've encountered tonight]; no calling each other "f-ggot" / gay / r-tard constantly, etc). No permas on first offense, just a [free] forced name change or increasing chat timeout
The game must be democratic, whoever puts an offensive nickname, the community itself will denounce that particular player, if he is toxic, the player may have a shitty nickname, but that does not mean that he has a shitty attitude, this will be justified in terms of complaints about your ID. There are also ways to change nicks, the administration itself could send this nick change ticket to a certain player with many complaints related to his nick, such as "a warning".
On 2/19/2023 at 12:43 AM, Maddalic said:Re-work high level perks (kind of frustrating imo that basically all of the game changing perks are unlocked 195+)
That's what the joker store is for.
On 2/19/2023 at 12:43 AM, Maddalic said:It's quite frustrating to vs people with perks you have no counter for
This encourages the player to play more to get a better grenade.
On 2/19/2023 at 12:43 AM, Maddalic said:Yes, it is a rated M-game but this is just dumb. No one wants to be forced to read your political opinions or whatever drivel your brain thinks up
I already talked about this.
On 2/19/2023 at 12:43 AM, Maddalic said:Haven't played Enforcer much but seems like Crims have side activities to do on an empty server but Enf don't. Maybe like "take reports" from citizens and doing bank runs for stores to have parallels to mugging & smash-and-grab?)
The enforcer can arrest the thief and take all the money.
You can steal using your criminal character and send the money to your enforcer character. Just put some product up for auction with your enforcer at the same price as what you managed to steal with your criminal character.
edit: You make the payment with your criminal.
On 2/19/2023 at 12:43 AM, Maddalic said:Boats & motorcycles
Maybe motorcycles. It's a semi-open world urban game, not an open world like GTA.
edit: But it won't be cool if they put motorcycles with the same handling or worse than what we already have with cars.
This could be placed in the very distant future.
On 2/19/2023 at 12:43 AM, Maddalic said:Bad Manners medal (negative points)
Good idea. A player with a certain number of reports on their ID could have their name tarnished (literally). Just changing the color of your nick, for all to see.
On 2/19/2023 at 12:43 AM, Maddalic said:-
If you blow up a certain number of cars in a row before they are unlocked during a car steal mission -
If you hide in one of the "nah nah nah" spots on a hold mission on a 1v1 or 2v1 in your favor [gold = 2 silver, so a single gold or two silvers could use the spots in this case]; we all know where they are so it "shouldn't be hard" to fence them then check if the item is sitting in it
-
-
36 minutes ago, TheMessiah said:Can think of 2 systems for current state of matchmaking(till we get the cross dist/the new one)Idk is gonna be easy to be made dou
System1: Option to go ready(K)and u get oposition only ur own threat even if u have to wait(silvers only vs silvers,silver+gold only vs silver+gold etc)
System2: The above system plus also the option to hit a command and get a list with everybody in district(players in ready,in mission and also their threats)So u can challenge to a mission player in ready(only if is ur threat or above)
Make a post with your ideas, they are very good, people will like it, maybe there is some mobilization in the community.
-
6 minutes ago, NotZombieBiscuit said:You're really convoluting this.
I tried to describe every possible situation.
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, MACKxBOLAN said:idk, its a good idea. but.
First thing comes to mind is the groups.
If you have a mix of threats in one group, this would make the MM take longer for the group.
The Golds grouped or not would have a harder time getting missions.
They would see this as a punishment and maybe leave the game, play less. Then we are back to square one.
We must be fair to the golds while providing opportunity and motivation to the lower threat
You made me have another idea: when by chance, if the district at any time had few golds, then this mechanism could only, only in those cases, confront gold against bronze and silver. I will edit and put in the post.
Let's see that, if there are many golds in the district, it won't take long to find matches.
For example if we compare the current matchmaking to that before the 1.30 update, with the increase in the number of players in districts to 100, matches are being found extremely easier.
For example, a match is usually 4 vs 4. If the district had 10 enforcers golds and 5 criminals golds, you can put a match of 4 enforcers golds vs 4 criminals golds. It could be a 2vs2 match and another 2vs2 match, but we are working with the average number of matches that the APB offers and which is enough to satisfy a good match. Besides that the algorithm would be very specific and there could be failures, 4vs4 is very good.
|--Only in cases of scarcity, only 2 enf golds and 2 crim golds remain from the entire population of the district. Only and only in this case could 2 crim golds vs 2 enf golds enter matches.
If you wanted to make a 1vs1 match to record and put on youtube, L.O could open the Fight Clubs to open in 1v1 and in the far future with APB 2.0, L.O could create small maps for this purpose, and create another system for players create private rooms with these small maps.
Back to the subject: So there would be 6 enforcers golds and 1 criminal gold left. These are all golds in the district. So, when the number of golds criminals was dissimilar with the number of golds enforcers or the number of enforcers golds were different from the number of criminals golds, then we would separately divide the number of enforcers golds so that it would be divided into groups with 2 players, and the number of criminals golds as well, each pair would be sent to play against bronzes and silvers. If the number on one of the sides did not match (in the case of our example the criminal), the system would send it to play against bronzes and silvers.
Remembering that I had 6 enforcers golds and 1 criminal gold left in my example, so 6/3 = 2, 3 groups of 2 would be sent separately to play matches against bronzes and silvers. 2 would go to one match, another 2 to another different match and the remaining 2 to another different match. The 1 remaining criminal would also be released for any match against bronzes and silvers, as we are working with pairs and 1 criminal is not part of a pair, so there is no way he can enter a match |--against 2 enforcers (I'm saying this, so that the algorithm is not so heavy and so specific).
Remembering that I had 6 enforcers golds and 1 criminal gold left in my example, if you and your friends were some of the enforcers and you were in a group of 4, all with the "k" pressed and waiting for a match, you would go to different matches, 2 would go to a match and you + another would go to another different match.
|--Remembering what I said at the beginning: Only groups of 4 crim golds vs 4 enf golds will be formed.
* If there were 10 players in the total population of a district, with 9 golds and 1 bronze (4 crim gold, 5 enf gold and 1 bronze), unfortunately it would be left over for a 1v1 match of 1 gold against 1 bronze. But they are rare cases;
* Or if the total population of a district were 11 players, with 9 golds and 2 bronzes (4 crim gold, 5 enf gold and 2 bronze) there would be a match of 1 gold against 2 bronzes. But these are rare cases.
-
Instead of separating districts by their respective medals (bronze, silver and gold) as it was before, there should be some mechanism keeping the districts the way they are today, a district for everyone, however, with selected matches.
I don't know how to do that, but in my layman's opinion on the matter, there should be some mechanism to detect a limit of matches in which a certain player won to reach gold. A player with many matches played to reach gold is certainly a normal player, a player who played few matches to win gold, he is out of the ordinary.
So, with this information, the mechanism would put the "players with the most matches played to win gold" together in a match (both on one side and the other - enforcers and criminals), this would happen in the same way with the players with the fewest matches played to win the gold. This would encompass the entire match, not just for one side, but for both sides (criminals and enforcers).
Detail: I'm talking about a mechanism that aims to find matches only for golds, it doesn't involve silver or bronzes, it's only for golds.
For silver and bronze, it continues as it currently exists.EDIT: This mechanism could fail sometimes, it could be that due to some failure some bronze or silver drops in a match with a gold, but these cases must be rare, the essence of the problem must be solved.
Essence of the problem: Normal players and beginners fall into disadvantaged matches against old and experienced golds. They must be separated.
Golds must play against themselves, they must be treated differently from other players. However, this should be done the way I wrote it here, you shouldn't separate the districts by threats as it was before, because the golds are few compared to the amount of them with the rest of the players (most are bronze or silver), that would discourage the golds from playing, as I said before, this system must be flawed, no can be 100% (maybe 85% faithful - it must be complicated to make something extremely faithful with these descriptions [ but it has to be flawed, but not too much {you won't waste time doing something shitty}]), rare cases should happen that golds fall in matches against normal players, but this MUST BE RARE. ---> When I say "but it has to be flawed, but not too much" I am referring to these "rare cases". I want to make this very clear, because it wouldn't work and it wouldn't be healthy if these "rare cases" happened all the time.
• When by chance, if the district at any time had few golds, then this mechanism could only, only in those cases, confront gold against bronze and silver.
Leave your opinion in the comments.
EDIT:
I actually rambled a lot. Thanks anyway for the comments, there are many ideas from yours that are valuable.
I tried to give some idea on the subject, but I don't understand much. But anyway, the intention was good.
-
On 9/28/2022 at 11:56 AM, GabsS said:Since game update is taking so long i would love to read what’s your ideas to bring apb reloaded live. (Anticheat is not an option, we all know this is first)
I start:* Game statistics: we all hate when u press k and some high players join and u can't kill him one. Would be perfect if the game recognizes how many kills and deaths you do in the match and match you with similar ones. Will not be perfect but will prevent you to play against unkillable people.
* IA (Bots): i know, play against the bot is not funny but is less funny if you need to wait 10 min to get matchmaking or even if you can't play on districts where you have contact but no players. Could be less rewards and player can replace em any time. 1 vs 2 isnt fair? Well, a bot could do some damage and be the bait.
Please ignore grammatic errors.The second option is ruled out. With the district's population increasing to 100, matches are being found much faster than before.
The first option is still an issue. Matchmaking...
Instead of separating districts by their respective medals (bronze, silver and gold) as it was before, there should be some mechanism keeping the districts the way they are today, a district for everyone, however, with selected matches.
I don't know how to do that, but in my layman's opinion on the matter, there should be some mechanism to detect a limit of matches in which a certain player won to reach gold. A player with many matches played to reach gold is certainly a normal player, a player who played few matches to win gold, he is out of the ordinary.
So, with this information, the mechanism would put the players with the most matches played to win gold together in a match (both on one side and the other - enforcers and criminals), this would happen in the same way with the players with the fewest matches played to win the gold.
On 2/15/2023 at 6:00 AM, RadmanBonyadi said:1- There's only cars in this game and it's not realistic. If they add Motorcycles, Helicopters, boats or ,,,, . I know it's tough to do that, because you have to redo and update whatever you've created, but it'll worth to try.
You are taking a step bigger than your leg. How about improving the handling of cars?
Imagine if they put in all these transport options, but the handling was similar or even worse than cars? HAHAHAHA
-
-
New updates.
in Game
19 hours ago, Sergsininia said:The only one I don't see as a bad suggestion, is explosive weapons banned in Asylum. Basically the OPGL, OSMAW, EOL, etc due to the cramped quarters. But otherwise, the rest of the suggestions just seem like darts thrown at a board to see whatever would stick.
Like NTEC is a fairly reliable gun for most any beginner, as a fairly nice improvement over the STAR, with the added detriment to require more skill vs. the STAR.
2 Shot burst FBW? It already has one of the fastest fire rates for a semi-auto secondary. No thanks, RFP is pretty much the fun you're looking for.
I don't think N-TEC is for beginners. You see, in the same text you say that it is reliable for beginners and then you say that it requires more skill than STAR.
In other words: STAR is easier to play than N-TEC, so beginners will be more familiar with STAR, so they will play with STAR and not with N-TEC.
No beginner will have N-TEC skills, fact. I'm advocating that it stays that way, N-TEC must forever be a tough weapon to handle, so once you understand it, you've mastered it.
EDIT:
One of these days i was in a full match, and among the enemies there was 1 beginner playing with an N-TEC. Poor guy, he didn't know where he was going with that gun. Imagine the situation XD. Those who are older here understand what I'm talking about.
-
Yes. You no longer have that delay to find matches, in addition to the fact that the game is more fluid.
My PC was manufactured by satan, it sucks, even so i noticed a positive difference in the gameplay, it's more fluid, for sure.
-
1
-
-
On 2/11/2023 at 9:35 AM, Username24nuke said:Matt Scott said the enhanced graphics engine upgrade from consoles will release in 2019-2020 following 64bit, I nearly died in a car crash, and corona virus nearly killed me. I guess all this time went by for something that deeply disappoints me.
APB 1.30 seems to be the same but with more graphical and gameplay bugs. Is this all of it? 5 years you could've made APB spinoff on Unreal Engine 4.
Next, APB will shutdown? and how about the money players spent on the game? will they sue?
They wouldn't have wasted time on something for nothing. So the APB will not close. I had the same thought as you, but if the APB were to close, it would have closed already.
-
New updates.
in Game
1 hour ago, Reprimand said:Congratulations on the recent update. A lot of players are satisfied with the changes and I sense good things on the horizon.
This is not a suggestion, just my two cents since everybody gets their say and I would like mine.
Little Orbit need to prioritise the following changes in this order:
1. Cheating / Anti-Cheat
2. Ranking
3. Matchmaking
4. Weapon Balance
Why? Because this is what matters to the playerbase the most.
Cheaters make it difficult for legitimate players to enjoy the game.
Ranking makes it harder for players to be rewarded for their efforts.
Matchmaking improperly pairs high level players with the inexperienced.
Weapon Balance is subjective, and always will be. However, the NTEC reigns supreme and other weapons merely live its shadow.
Here is what I want to see in coming days:
Enable tracers.
Lower rank requirement on modifications from 255 to 100.
Weaken Clotting Agent. Nerf Happy Landing.
Force the healing reusables into the green modification slot.
Fix the weapons on the ARMAS Marketplace. Some of them are awaiting patches, particularly the JOKER "Talon" RFP. Any attachments which require fixing should be fixed first.
Add trails to grenades and grenade launchers.
Ban OGPL and OSMAW from Fight Club. Prevent jumping with OGPL.
Add a two-shot fire to the Obeya FBW.
Reintroduce old weapons on the Marketplace.
Thank you.
I think matchmaking should be in second place, it's a very worrying thing these days...
Not that the ranking issue is irrelevant, no, not at all, but matchmaking stands out. When we talk about matchmaking we are referring to the long term as well as the short term.
When a new player enters the game and starts a game, he will have a lot of difficulty, this is the short term, something that makes an impression at first sight. This new player will not play many matches and will not return to APB, this is long term.
The ranking problem is more linked to the long term, when a player enters a new game, he will not think about rewards, he will just want to play and waste his time having fun, only when he plays routinely will he pay attention to rewards , and playing routinely is something you earn over time.
EDIT:
1 hour ago, Reprimand said:Add a two-shot fire to the Obeya FBW.
Add a two-shot fire to the Obeya FBW. ---- I don't understand that part, it doesn't seem relevant. I don't see the need for this, there are other pistols that already do this.
1 hour ago, Reprimand said:However, the NTEC reigns supreme and other weapons merely live its shadow.
It has always been like this and it must remain like this, the N-TEC that is sold in contacts is a difficult weapon to handle, the skill to master it you gain with time. There are other very good weapons - OBIR, for example.
I don't know if you're referring to legendary N-TEC or the N-TEC sold in contacts.
But anyway, N-TEC Ursus has always led the market, it's very good and it has to stay that way, maybe some extremely light nerf to its damage.
A little story of mine:
N-TEC sold in contacts was never a weapon for beginners or anyone, and it must remain so forever. I remember when I joined the APB, I admired those who played with the N-TEC, because I didn't really understand the dynamics of the weapon. Currently I only play with her, because I wanted to play like those guys who played with her and I dedicated a lot of time to learning. And it's not extremely difficult to learn, just play with her every day...
I think that the essence of N-TEC is really this, technique, and this must be preserved.
-
I think this solved the problem we had, as was slow to find matches.
-
It is good? What is your opinion?
Any news for anyone using a lousy computer?
What actually changed?
How are the loadings?
I haven't played yet.
-
26 minutes ago, StevenDeckard said:Alguém sabe se você precisa desinstalar a versão antiga do APB primeiro ou pode apenas atualizar da maneira normal? E o bom e velho "Advanced APB Launcher" ainda funciona após esta atualização?
I would also like to know this, my computer is extremely bad so i need ADV Launcher.
-
1
-
-
-
11 hours ago, MattScott said:Olá a todos,
Para aqueles que não acompanham minhas atualizações de 64 bits, estou criando um novo tópico aqui onde os jogadores podem discutir problemas de teste.Abrimos um servidor de teste público que agora está online para APB 1.30, a atualização de 64 bits.
Tivemos um grupo de jogadores da comunidade em distritos de teste ontem.
Antes de fornecer notas e links abaixo, quero definir expectativas. Esta é a nossa terceira tentativa de atualizar o APB e sua enorme base de código. A primeira tentativa foi terminar o trabalho iniciado no APB 2.x antes de assumirmos. Toda essa tentativa foi falha porque o código subjacente era o código do console APB. Eles pularam partes importantes do 1.20 quando fizeram essa atualização, portanto, obter um melhor desempenho nunca seria possível. Nossa segunda tentativa foi começar com o APB 1.20 e extrair toda a funcionalidade do APB 2.x. Esse esforço também falhou, porque simplesmente havia muitas partes móveis.
Portanto, decidimos reduzir as coisas e simplesmente atualizar a base de código para 64 bits. Isso nos dá compatibilidade nativa com cartões RTX, mas minha esperança é que isso não seja diferente do APB 1.20. Estamos apenas chegando à primeira base, em vez de continuar a atacar tentando fazer um home run. A partir daqui, podemos selecionar recursos de 2.x e migrá-los um por um para 1.30.
"Não quero que o Perfeito seja inimigo do Bom." A comunidade esperou muito tempo para avançar. Então, estou ansioso para conseguir uma base decente para construir.
Observações para o teste:- A partir desta noite, abrimos o acesso a todos os jogadores. Não há lista de permissões ou NDA para o teste. Qualquer pessoa pode baixar o cliente e fornecer feedback nos fóruns.
- Você pode entrar no OTW baixando o iniciador aqui: http://apb.patch.ot.gamersfirst.com/APB_OTW_Installer.exe
- Streaming e discussão aberta do teste são permitidos a partir deste post.
- O EasyAntiCheat está presente no momento - mas estamos usando o Battleye por enquanto. Como mencionado anteriormente, nosso plano é integrar o EasyAntiCheat o mais rápido possível.
Erros conhecidos:
-
Se você tiver problemas ao executar o jogo, execute a ferramenta de reparo do inicializador.
- Há um problema com o BattlEye e vários diretórios APB que a execução de “Repair” no iniciador OTW corrigirá.
- Existem problemas conhecidos envolvendo o reaparecimento de portas em partes específicas dos mapas.
- Há um problema com as máquinas Joker Ammo repetindo o áudio.
- Shaders e iluminação podem estar incorretos em certas áreas dos mapas.
- Sabe-se que existe uma falha altamente específica relacionada ao estúdio de música.
- Sabe-se que existe uma falha altamente específica relacionada ao editor de roupas.
Desde que não haja grandes bloqueadores durante o teste, planejamos passar para o LIVE com 1,30 o mais rápido possível.
Esperamos vê-lo testando no jogo!
Obrigado,Matt
That's what I was talking about. Are critics now hopeful? Something I said weeks ago?
-
Man, how sad. What remains is to enjoy the moments until the game closes. A great game, but with a sad ending.
edit: From the analysis I did, the APB really has its days numbered. A few years ago, some people said the same thing, but now there really isn't a shred of hope.
-
It seems that the APB has its days numbered. This whole situation is sad. Now that some things have been clarified, I wish someone who understands more about the subject could answer my questions from the post.
My thoughts on 2023 roadmap
in Social District (General Discussion)
Posted
Instead of putting a mission queuing, they should put a queue to enter the district and not a mission queuing. I think there are conflicts of players joining the same district at the same time, then one is thrown back to the login screen and Battle Eye announces it as "client is slow".