Jump to content
Forum rules

Kast2

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    186

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Kast2

  6. Posted

    8 minutes ago, Bva said:

    Since i dont see my thread anywhere anymore i decided to post it again but this time in more detail.
    My VoiP has been broken ever since the BE update yesterday, i've already tried multiple things.

    Restarting PC, APB and Vivox;
    Repairing APB;
    Removing Vivox+Repairing APB;
    Updating Sound Card;

    Re-install APB;

    Disconnected all input devices and connecting them again;
    Closing Vivox whilst APB is running, and opening it again;
    Turning on ''Push to talk'' and turning it off, neither of them appear to work;
    Disabling/Enabling VoiP in-game.

    My voice communication works perfectly fine on Discord and Skype.
    I seem to be one of the few who is experiencing these issues, if anyone has any tips/fixes that i didn't try yet, please suggest them.

     

    Strange, for me everything is working. Given the many steps of fix attempt you've made I think it can go to the conclusion that it's a rare little bug.
    If you can't fix it in any way, report this problem in the "Bugs and Tech Issues" section.

    @CANINE I tag a moderator that I found very helpful, waiting in an answer.

    • Thanks 1

  8. Posted

    On the unban of thousands of accounts i'm in agreement, several of these banned unjustly and as seen by steamcharts, is yielding to the game several players who were not seen from 2013.
    As for the wipe it may be there, but I would have taken away maybe only 70%, but I can understand that it can be a difficult operation.

    • Like 1

  11. Posted

    2 hours ago, xCROv said:

    A lot of big cheat makers that make the "buy the sub and download and go" style cheats dont touch games with BE because of the way BE actually does it's detection and bans. It's not worth their time to constantly patch and update their cheats just to be able to support people getting banned and stuff.

     

    I'm sorry to give a bad news, but having been in these kinds of "communities", the biggest providers of these maleficent tools are already working on how to get around the new anti-cheat. I therefore foresee a return of the cheaters in a few weeks, if not days.

     

    This means that there is a constant need to complete BE to the maximum.

  12. Posted

    9 minutes ago, Boba said:

    That's why fairfight is really is really important. Any person with C/C++ background would understand my point, which the importance of having both server sided and client sided protection to effectively eliminate suspicious/cheating actions. Problem is a lot of people replying either didn't understand my point properly or are just commenting with 0 knowledge of how cheat detection works. They're just delusional and are going through wishful thinking that battleye alone is sufficient.

    A few years ago I worked on two sites (which are currently online) that sell cheats. Out of curiosity given the new acquisition I contacted him to see if they were willing to continue with a future cheat of APB and apparently they are. For this reason the BattlEye should not be underestimated.

  13. Posted

    4 minutes ago, PTCntte said:

    EasyAntiCheat is barely doing something, I see it in most of the online games but people still uses cheats often, what I did not saw in my gaming experience is cheaters under BattlEye hands. 

    So we can compare too many anti-cheat softwares, but we never truly checked their actions within the game (except for FairFight which is currently a walking joke).

    For the moment the EasyAntiCheat I saw only working on Dead by Daylight and Fortnite, so I wouldn't venture too much, but a BattlEye - EasyAntiCheat pair would be hard to overcome.
    Regarding the BattlEye, there are some games where there is still the presence of cheater, but they are banned in not even 2 days.
    Fairfight is a system recording, and not a real anticheat (which then identifies the cheat), but records the actions of a player and then a Staffer (real and true) must evaluate whether those types of statistics are human or not. In Battlefield it works. It would only be to adjust a little and take several GMs.

  14. Posted

    2 hours ago, Boba said:

    Since Battleye is coming to apb, I just wanna raise awareness to something. People who play PUBG know that Battleye alone is very far from a proper cheat detection mechanism. So, will Battleye be present with fairfight, or it's a case of either/or? I know for a fact that battleye alone is not sufficient and it will just be a matter of time before new  cheats are made, and that would suck! I'm recommending Punkbuster + Battleye + Fairfight(if possible) since it would be really hard to bypass three layers, 2 of which are client-sided injection detectors.

    What are you guys' thoughts on this?

    If updated as you should the BattlEye can safely go it alone, but if you want to be sure you can try it for:
    1. BattlEye - Fairfight - EasyAntiCheat
    2. BattlEye - Fairfight
    3. BattlEye - EasyAntiCheat

    PunkBuster in the past gave so many problems, so it has been removed and it is better that there is never more.

×
×
  • Create New...