Jump to content
Forum rules

MitneAlt

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    70

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by MitneAlt

  3. Posted

    Just now, niblyv said:

    if you dont want alt forum abusers ban the "alts" but whats the point 🙂 its a free game and browser vpns are also free  🙂

    That's main problem. VPNs because I imagine this will be based on IPs?

    Then i move my second account over VPN at least forum-wise, it's not even that problematic.

  6. Posted · Edited by MitneAlt

    I agree. It's slowly hard to get original name in-game - i don't talk about account wipe, we just should make unactive users (2011-2013 should be safe right?) to take one new names when/if they rejoin us.

    On 6/16/2018 at 2:24 AM, iTzHaze said:

    there was a thread/post not too long ago regarding unmerged names (pre server merge) possibly being wiped. not sure if anything will come of it though.

     

    to be honest it's a tough one to call just deleting peoples names, especially if they have spent money on the account. inactive or not does not really matter. fact is it belongs to someone.

    They just losing right to their current name and free slot, jeez.

    It's not like we removing their accounts.

  7. Posted · Edited by MitneAlt

    I love all these advices.

    You all learned yourself - give that guy chance to do so cause right now i see ego stroking.

    And he is right skill gap between silver threat and gold is so huge it sometimes worry me. You might meet trash gold but most likely you meet up experinced veteran when on silver you meet mediocre potatos most of time (well with expection of obvious dethreaters).

    It's also one of many main reasons why people dethreat.

  8. Posted · Edited by MitneAlt

    2 hours ago, TheTankBal said:

    im not saying names. im just thinking BE isnt really doing its job.

     

    Nice, typical silver tactics - running into the same place 3 times in row. Believe me, they expect you from there.

    Pro tip: Next time... try to attack other sides?

  9. Posted

    5 hours ago, LilyV3 said:

    if you cosntantly and under full awareness play with cheaters to win and even intend to take a cheater with you to win that still is cheating. it's just not using hacks to cheat by your own. but it would be hard to have evidence for this.

    Actually proving this is almost impossible.

    You would need to follow every single match of that person.

  10. Posted

    5 hours ago, TheJellyGoo said:

    That's the saddest attempt to undermine one of my posts I've seen in a long time.

    Where do you even get the idea that FightClub is part of the equation here. Obviously pug based teaming in FC and or even action district is of no relevance.

    I am talking about individuals that deliberately group with multiple banned carries where it is apparent even to a third party to make a sound assessment.

    No. I didn't even need to undermine your post.

    There is simple fact: If you play with cheater, you are not cheating.

    So hard to understand?

  12. Posted

    Just now, Kairi said:

    No, not right. People that knowingly group with cheaters, especially the obvious cheaters, are just as culpable as the cheaters themselves in my opinion. That's what "I hope so." means.

     

    You don't even correctly read what I said, right?

    "I hope so. I also feel like that's where a fair amount of those "untraceable" bans went. Where people cheated on an alt account to carry groups and then were so surprised their main account came under the microscope and also got a ban. " ~ That's litteraly what you wrote. What does alt account ban and main with it along have with bans by assocation? Two different things. Someone teams up with cheaters vs someone cheating on alts.

    So yeah, I read correctly unlike you.

  13. Posted

    1 hour ago, Kairi said:

    I hope so. I also feel like that's where a fair amount of those "untraceable" bans went. Where people cheated on an alt account to carry groups and then were so surprised their main account came under the microscope and also got a ban. 

    You don't even correctly read what OP said, right?

    54 minutes ago, TheJellyGoo said:

    I bet some of those cases investigated by LO and considered wrongly banned fall under such category.

    I went out of my way to report 2-3 players that made it really easy to accumulate documented proof of them doing exactly that.

    They did end up on ff while (imo) not cheating themselves - justified nonetheless.

    Of course, everything is justifed to you tho.

    Hey guys - you all who are forced to play with cheaters via FC teams - you all deserve BANS!

    Also it's know that FFs algorithm is stats-based. It like to ban for abnormality in stats, both known and hidden.

  14. Posted · Edited by MitneAlt

    I actually agree on disabling rank requirements for mods.

    What of most disgusting things I saw in-games are finals of missions with one team being under R195 overall and second being R195 or above. They usually pack item or themselves into car, one takes car surfer and OSMAW/OPGL or LMG and proceed to defend car while opposition without this mods are pretty much struggling to get objective/kill targets.

    Thankfully I though of some good counter-strategy which I will share to some under R195 which are struggling. Whenever something like that happens, passanger should pick up DMR or ISSR-B (better but ARMAs option) and shot down car surfer - both weapons you can use while peeking outside windows and they have huge car damage (and can deal with opponents out in open pretty quick too, with no misses it should easily outshot OSMAW), so after eliminating car surfer, proceed to shot car - it will quickly burst in flames, make sure driver or other passangers are prepared with weapons they feel the best with... take over item and run away too with such equipped passanger (I mean, they did that - you have full right to do it too).

    You just won game, congratulations.

  16. Posted · Edited by MitneAlt

    Isn't encrypting like time and power consuming process? And since client would basically be decrypt key (cause i don't see it other way, decrypt key can come from server too but that can be abused via client) - It will just lower performance considerably and will only fix cheater problem short-term... You do know that decrypting is part of hackers job, right?

  17. Posted · Edited by MitneAlt

    Taking that fire sticks to anything flamable, it probably would be feature of gun in-game too... causing some ridiciolous use of that weapon.

    Meanwhile LTL is weaker than conventional weapons and outmatched by them in direct combat.

  20. Posted · Edited by MitneAlt

    On 5/28/2018 at 10:52 AM, freq said:

    I do sorta like this idea, although it'd be too hard to distinguish between actual false bans and people who did cheat, I don't think it'd be fair for legit players who put so many hours into their accounts.

    Look at me. I quit since all hours put into my main gone to waste. Why would I bother to try again? To get banned second time and this time community being like "Oh so you are like all this repeatable offenders?". That was my way of protest and should be of anyone sane... I never understood why people reroll after false ban.

    (It was before ToS of 25th so I guess for now we can go with it... we ourselves need just to go with rules right now - so no direct ban talking. And I don't see why they can't either put it in off-topic or close it. Nobody would cry.)

    • Like 1

  23. Posted · Edited by MitneAlt

    There is no way to hide release of Battleeye honestly because it gonna be released with patch and it's major change - meaning it needs to be include in patch notes.

    Also I don't specify message i got from support due how it violates ToS (not talking about bans etc.) but all this who gonna be unbanned gonna get message somewhere after Battleeye goes online.

×
×
  • Create New...