What exactly is the current stance on nudity on symbols?
As far as I can recall, the current stance on nudity is no private parts below the belt should be visible. Yet, even when adhering to that rule, <GM> Keyaert keeps taking down some of my symbols from social district display points, including a symbol of a male in underwear. So has LO changed their stance on nudity, or is there a GM overstepping boundaries? In the original post where Matt Scott states that they'll be keeping G1's policy, the link to G1's forum post is broken and just redire
The GMs in question removed the OP’s symbols on our direct orders. They were not acting on their own.
Our nudity policy is fairly permissive, however we do draw the line "below the belt." What this means is that we don't allow genitalia or sex. Incredibly form-fitting underwear or depictions of phalluses/sex toys are attempts to circumvent this policy through technicalities.
You can check out section 9 of our EULA for details, but we reserve the right to remove content th
