Jump to content
Darkzero3802

Autumn Event Flawed

Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, CookiePuss said:

3 words...

 

team

 

kill

 

event

 

I can say without a doubt in my head that the team kill event was a better event in my opinion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Kewlin said:

 

I can say without a doubt in my head that the team kill event was a better event in my opinion.

Harsh words.

For me the team kill event was just a day APB wasn't worth playing.

Then again, I did the event once and realized it wasn't my thing, so I didn't bother with it again.

 

... I'm realizing now that maybe I shouldn't have an opinion on this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, CookiePuss said:

3 words...

 

team

 

kill

 

event

While yes that event was bad at least it wasn't so bugged and flawed. That WAS the worst event in APB history until Autumn Assault...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, Darkzero3802 said:

While yes that event was bad at least it wasn't so bugged and flawed. That WAS the worst event in APB history until Autumn Assault...

Fair enough.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 12/1/2018 at 11:36 PM, CookiePuss said:

Harsh words.

For me the team kill event was just a day APB wasn't worth playing.

Then again, I did the event once and realized it wasn't my thing, so I didn't bother with it again.

 

... I'm realizing now that maybe I shouldn't have an opinion on this.

I didnt play that day lol but I do know that at least it wasnt as buggy and the rewards were for everyone unlike Autumn Assault where its bugged and flawed beyond reason and where only 1st place can get the reward. The events a griefers paradise as they can just keep winning and prevent others from getting the skin, while the GMs dont use any force to prevent it and just keep asking to stop to no avail.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/30/2018 at 2:40 AM, NotZombieBiscuit said:

That is kind of lewd without context.

Kind of? You can almost feel the grey matter oozing from that post.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/22/2018 at 11:10 AM, thesamscout24 said:
On 11/22/2018 at 9:53 AM, Yoss said:

Every game I know of gives an incentive to play the test branch before it's pushed to live. It would REALLY help out our current population with testing.

An incentive to play the OTW (If it wasn't closed for internal testing) would be good.

except dota, csgo, overwatch, stardew valley, starbound... uhh... minecraft...?

(not sure abt pubg tbh)

 

i honestly can't think about any "major" game with a "regular pts". only early access/alpha/beta stage games come to my mind.

 

also... a closed otw (open test world) is not an otw xd

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, neophobia said:

except dota, csgo, overwatch, stardew valley, starbound... uhh... minecraft...?

(not sure abt pubg tbh)

 

i honestly can't think about any "major" game with a "regular pts". only early access/alpha/beta stage games come to my mind.

 

also... a closed otw (open test world) is not an otw xd

Realtime worlds the orig dev of APB did have an CBT and OBT phase of the game back in the day. Just given the game has changed hands twice since then and the orig coders are long gone + a custom code nobody knows how to exactly work it so bugs happen freq.  Once the new engine comes out with new code writing alot of things can be addressed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, neophobia said:

except dota, csgo, overwatch, stardew valley, starbound... uhh... minecraft...?

(not sure abt pubg tbh)

 

i honestly can't think about any "major" game with a "regular pts". only early access/alpha/beta stage games come to my mind.

 

also... a closed otw (open test world) is not an otw xd

r6 siege has regular test servers iirc

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, BXNNXD said:

r6 siege has regular test servers iirc

 

I don't believe Siege has any incentive though beside testing things.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Kewlin said:

 

I don't believe Siege has any incentive though beside testing things.

Given Seiges history they test things? rofl. But on topic gota give kuddos to GM mist tonight as she did kick repeat winners from the event after they continued to ignore the friendly reminder not to repeat.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Darkzero3802 said:

Given Seiges history they test things? rofl.

 

Huh?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, BXNNXD said:

r6 siege has regular test servers iirc

ye the games i mentioned have/had test servers/clients too, point was that none of them known to me rewarded players with anything but seeing/playing/testing new things early (plus being able to play with more things unlocked or w/e)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And tonight we had a GM in Jericho WF that was basically afk the entire time. Games ran but thats abut it with all repeat winners so *shrugs* way to keep it goin.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×