NotZombieBiscuit 3145 Posted July 9, 2019 36 minutes ago, CookiePuss said: Very interesting. I wonder if they keep track of that kind of stat. They do. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fortune Runner 796 Posted July 9, 2019 1 hour ago, Glaciers said: it wasnt being updated or paid for by the time orbit bought apb also used for manual bans and non-cheating bans despite several lies to the contrary from g1 Thank you. good to know...and scary on that 2nd part 50 minutes ago, UubeNubeh DaWog said: Of course you can, its an anti cheat that cant be bypassed. Its efficiency is a different topic. ROFL ok true. 51 minutes ago, UubeNubeh DaWog said: FF being behavioral meant it was a fine line between catching cheaters and catching people who look like cheaters. Since the majority of the gaming community cant stand one false ban you have to make the system more lenient which can mean letting some people through. We have no idea how efficient those updates for FF would have been. Since its not a client side anti cheat they wouldn't be updating holes in the system. How obsolete you think a behavioral system becomes over time when the game doesnt change dramatically is probably the only thing up for debate right now. True and true. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Y2Venom 199 Posted July 9, 2019 Those figures make sense. 600 players 167 actually playing, 433 dethreating. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
