Jump to content
Forum rules

sijws

Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    23

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by sijws

  2. Posted

    12 minutes ago, El-Neko said:

    You should really clean out that ignore list then... Since lets be honest here most of those people you have is gone or inactive at this point.

    b-b-but what if one of them came back and he had to see a single toxic message from one of them? He would have to log off the computer for the rest of the week, he'd be so upset

  3. Posted

    On 6/9/2018 at 9:03 PM, Genobee said:

    Can't say it even really crossed my mind that some of you guys in certain regions wind up paying an insanely disproportionate amount. Which is only compounded by the prices being overly high to begin with. Ouch. Just.. ouch. 

    https://steamdb.info/app/654172/

     

    steam has a solution(regional pricing) for this that might work for g1c purchases through steam if little orbit wanted to go that route, check my link to see what its like in other games

  6. Posted

    3 hours ago, CookiePuss said:

    I swear I should just leave this formula as my signature

     

     

    As confirmed in a dev blog on the old forums, threat in APB is determined using a Bayesian modified version of this formula known as the Glicko rating system:

     

    maybe im wrong but isn't that irrelevant to how apb decides the winner? im pretty sure that the top 50% of the match in score receives the "win" to stop people from being boosted

  8. Posted

    7 minutes ago, KawaiPotato said:

     

    he already said that they wont bring back ban broadcast

    why wont he? something like the r6siege ingame announcements, where a bot wouldn't be able to pick them up so a website like ffbans can't be remade

     

    the community is pretty one sided on this, they want to see bans happening

     

  11. Posted · Edited by sijws

    9 minutes ago, Kewlin said:

    You might be better off contacting support and asking, 'cause we don't know.

    he might be better off waiting for a reply from the "Community Manager" or the game director that post on the forums regularly : )

    he might be better off not wasting the time of support asking a question they wont know : )

    he might be better off not waiting 20 days for a response : )

    you might be better off not wasting your own time replying to threads with useless suggestions : )

  12. Posted

    46 minutes ago, BuggedOut said:

    Wave's can be controlled- in this instance perhaps they simply unbanned everyone they felt should get an unban outright, and still have a pool of players that are in the "We question putting you in the OK to unban wave, but reach out to us and maybe we can help you" phase?

    ? They are doing another wave, they aren't at the reach out to you phase but they told people they were.

  14. Posted

    5 minutes ago, DouglasFalcon said:

    ...shouldn't we think about fixing the pre-set lease weapons that you can purchase from contacts?
    Right now most pre-set mods are bad (IR3 on HVR) or straight up downgrades for the weapon (like HB3 on ALIG), giving these weapons little to no reason to use them.
    Of course, you can argue that "you can buy 3 open slots version on ARMAS" or "you can level up that role and get a 3 open slot version from contacts", but the first solution takes A LOT of real money and the second one takes A LOT of time. 

    It shouldn't even be the best combination of mods ever possible, you could for example put Tagger instead of 3PS3 on HVR, making it a sub-optimal version, but at least you feel rewarded for unlocking these weapons and progressing through contacts.

     

    This should also apply to some of the pre-set weapons that we can buy in ARMAS: ALIG "Surefire" and Shaw "First Blood" always come to my mind lol, they're supposed to make up for the fact that you can't afford mods atm so instead you buy pre-modded weapins for, say, one month. BUT! Surprise! These mods suck patootie and you wasted your money (real money tho).

    Of course this would be a very low priority, the game has so many bigger flaws and I think most people are now used to pre-set weapons being terrible, but I think this should not be overlooked.

     

    What do you guys think, is it a bad idea? And if so, why?

    so.. make them not bis like they currently are? gotcha

  15. Posted

    6 hours ago, VeryCuteKitty said:

    Fairfight bans worked on flags ,large amount of players was flagged for the same reason and FF created a group of the same players ,so LO has unblocked the largest groups to allow the most players get unblocked.

    And now they gonna start unblocking the other flags/groups.(the smaller amount of players)

    This why there's another wave and not everyone has been unblocked. 

    wrong

  16. Posted

    7 minutes ago, Bornstellar said:

    Perhaps they want to double check themselves? Make sure they didn't miss anyone from the initial FF unban wave?

     

    I dunno, double checking seems pretty important in this situation.

    Why would you not double check after unbanning the (thousands?) of people that are still banned that were expecting unbans lol?

     

    dont make much sense

  17. Posted

    Why would you tell the players to submit a ticket if they weren't unbanned after todays maintenance if you planned to do a second unban wave to get the people banned before fairfights implementation? Didn't this just result in your support lines getting completely blasted out and filled with useless tickets that will inevitably be unbanned in the second wave anyways?

     

    Just seems strange to me, considering you were already having such an issue with timely support responses

×
×
  • Create New...