Jump to content
Forum rules

Ebola-Chan

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    673

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Ebola-Chan

  1. Posted

    40 minutes ago, NotZombieBiscuit said:

    What are you talking about. 

     

    You obviously know nothing at all about game developing.

     

    Just copy and paste the APB files in to UE4 and you're done.

    No, you just rename the file code from unreal engine3 to unreal engine 4 and thats it

  10. Posted

    2 hours ago, PACwoMAN said:

    Well u can try to install HWINFO64 and RTSS both to view how exactly is your PC usage under APB. IMO your CPU is too bad for APB cuz it's AMD (too weak single core performance). I'm at i7 and still have fps drops to 50 even with low settings (GTX1060 is about 50% usage, CPU 45-60%, RAM 6.5GB's).

     

    BTW that FX are Bulldozer which don't have multithreading for all cores its like 4 cores in total because of one bus per two cores included. Even the old Phenom II 1075T are faster

    Well tbh i have amd 7 2700x not overclocked and the game works at around 90fps most of the time and at first it works perfectly but as always the longer you play the worse the performance gets

  17. Posted

    16 hours ago, BXNNXD said:
    On 8/17/2018 at 9:54 AM, SML said:

    4 threats are not enough to divide players to their skills. it needs more sensitivity = more threats. One gold player can be lifeless tryharder, other gold can be just skilled. They should not be in the same threat. One silver can be just dethreated from gold, other silver can be a new silver from bronze. So put more threats + threat districts. Threat district should be owned by its own threadt not others! If you want to play with your friend go play in open conflict.

    And make threats weekly change. So a dethreater will see the results a week later. And i am sure that nobody will dethtreat for one week plus if he/she is playing with more "equal" players he wont even try to dethreat.

    each threat color has 10 internal levels that are not shown visually, so in reality we have 40 different threat levels
    is this why i aleayd get matched agains 4 people as 3 ?
    or get matched agains 4 silvers

  18. Posted

    8 minutes ago, Fortune Runner said:

    This looks like troll posts to me so in the art of trolling as a topic...

    If you want to mess with golds in bronze make them and their cars viewed on both the large and mini map while they are gold during the mission.
    Nothing like knowing where someone is to kill them easier

    not taking this thread seriously though


    i doubt that it will work
    bronzes dont know what radar is

  19. Posted

    Just now, SML said:

    4 threats are not enough to divide players to their skills. it needs more sensitivity = more threats. One gold player can be lifeless tryharder, other gold can be just skilled. They should not be in the same threat. One silver can be just dethreated from gold, other silver can be a new silver from bronze. So put more threats + threat districts. Threat district should be owned by its own threadt not others! If you want to play with your friend go play in open conflict.

    And make threats weekly change. So a dethreater will see the results a week later. And i am sure that nobody will dethtreat for one week plus if he/she is playing with more "equal" players he wont even try to dethreat.


    there are way too many golds who are not even skilled
    i consider myself decent at this game
    im not a tryhard but i have never been silver and never abused the meta
    but i agree that 4 threats is not enough

  20. Posted

    So for people to stop whining about weapon balance 
    i found a new way to make people stop whining
    thats how it goes

    make golds have -50% hp and deal -25% dmg
    make silvers deal 10% more dmg to golds (not changed agains silvers and below)
    make bronzes have 50% more hp and deal 25% dmg to silvers and 50% dmg to golds

    if a dethreater is detected kick him from the aerver and roll him back to R9

    ty

  21. Posted

    On 8/13/2018 at 3:55 AM, ShadesofGrey said:
    On 8/12/2018 at 11:46 PM, Kat said:

    I think shredder balance changes were tested by porn bots cus even a chimp brain could deduce a 3-shot-from-50m shotgun shouldn't be pushed to live

    The only way to beat Shredder at this point, is a point blank HVR (OOPS NERFEDLOL), and a Yukon(OOPS NERFEDOMEGALUL).
    thats silver logic for ya

  22. Posted

    13 minutes ago, Fasalina said:

    Highly doubt anything can be said about "new" content untill the EU is out (thisyearPls).

    Personally if LO ever gets that far i hope they focus on new districts rather than implementing a new car or gun every so often which is probably gonna take some time to build. 


    new districts ware going to split the community since the district would probably be with contacts over 255...

  25. Posted

    1 minute ago, Keshi said:
    i mean..what if you are paying extra for the adder just because that model has a scope on it... classic G1 

    Same goes for the ntec and cr5. cr5 is more expensive than the ntec but they are just reskins
    ak vs m16(that somewhat performs like an m4)
    i have all of the ntec reskins but i dont have the ntec
    and i always buy the ntec dvah to use it
    i just hate the cr5 and vas sword for some reason
×
×
  • Create New...