Jump to content

Voerman

Members
  • Content Count

    2478
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Voerman


  1. 6 hours ago, MACKxBOLAN said:

    Returning to Threat Districts like I been saying for years, but NO. LO seems to enjoy the butchery of casual and 

    new players. Leading to not Brain Damage per say', But deep emotional pain and grief. 

     Some aren't smart thru this Trickle Dumb Down idea you have, but simply don't GAF and are in game 

    just to clown. God will Judge those who cheat

    if you feel "deep emotional pain and grief" because any in-game related issue, you need to step away from the computer and stare into a mirror for a good long hour.


  2. 5 hours ago, MACKxBOLAN said:

    Ya I share the belief that 90 % of apb are cheaters, that LO won't ban, 

    or permanently ban them. That Matt won't come to work because he knows

    so many cheaters are playing and won't address the issue. 

     Furthermore I think the cheaters and the LO staff are Buddy's via Discord, 

    and all in Cahoots. So Ok nobody cares what I 'Think'. 

     LO also doesn't care what my Wallet Thinks.

    I have 'Ranted, Raged, Sniveled, and cried to no avail. 

    I'm certainly not going to fund LO to get insulted by cheaters.

    Its not even about if they cheat or if Matt shows up, or if Matt bans.

    I simply don't want to hang out with a bunch of smutty minded

    cheater fakes who have dif names everyday but talk like they been around,

    wanna be team leader n tell ya how to live, have humor of a 4th grader with 

    they mind stuck in the Adult Tube. Who's ventures in Life only encompass

    the 4th grade lunch room. Who ride on their fake aimbot to maintain

    a narcissism of Gods. 

     I told U punks, You Reap What You Sow'

    Oh I aint mad at ya, I just don't be fuxin with ya no more.

    n U can tell that to Matt Scott.

     I mean, ez way to not get aimbotted or talked down upon by some

    Gold narcissist, to not wait for Matt to show up, to not wait for new content, ect.

    Just Don't play APB

    what the actual fuck are you even saying anymore


  3. 13 hours ago, Hexerin said:

    You seem to have missed that my post was made as a general statement, not specifically directed at this thread's topic.

    and yet it was posted here and therefore i made it on-topic, as in accordance to the forum's rules to keep threads on-topic. those things you wish the moderators to, you know, moderate.

     

    Removed insults ~@mayii


  4. 5 hours ago, JunoSuzuki said:

    I 100% agree with Pufty here. Also, winners were chosen. What people forget here are that there are actual humans sitting there reading through all this shit and i can imagine that they feel really upset right now. This forum became a place of negativity and makes me avoid it as good as i can while others are farming their post counters with content that have zero value nor contribute to anything.

     

    Consequences would be to only use it for announcement purposes rather than actual tool for community projects and interaction as sad as it is and i hope that Little Orbit will keep working with those who are really interested in creating a nice community environment. Because, as @Pufty stuff like this makes it harder for LO to approach us if the reaction they get is THIS. 

    >"this focus became a place of negativity and makes me avoid it as good as i can"

    >posts anyway

    >"while others are farming their post counters with content that have zero value nor contribute to anything"

    >literally posts just to complain about the people complaining, and somehow having even less of a point except 'abloobloo my precious sensibilities'

    ok my guy. you can't sit on that high horse while beating it's carcass at the same time. kind of have to pick one or the other.

    5 hours ago, Hexerin said:

    Imagine if the moderators actually, you know, moderated. Course, that would also require Little Orbit to stop pandering to the worst / most toxic individuals in this community. I don't see MattScott owning up to that though, he seems fully content with the toxicity that pervades this place.

    as a former forum moderator on these very forums, unless LO has drastically changed many of the forum rules and guidelines - not a single rule has been broken and no moderator intervention should be necessary. are people a bit heavy-handed with their comments? yes, that's always been the case however. there is literally nothing wrong with people being iffed about the winning submissions. in fact, considering the sheer amount of negativity towards this specific topic, one could make the correlation that something being framed as a community event had rather little to do with the community outside of the submissions themselves. but that'd be crazy, right?

    giphy.gif


  5. 12 hours ago, Pufty said:

    Are we gonna start gatekeeping costumes from community interaction? You're making it difficult to be approachable from the company's side. You'll get less and less interaction and that's gonna be another thing to start complaining about. This is optional, right? What's the fuss then?

    gatekeeping isn't necessarily bad, but in this case it's not even a matter of gatekeeping. it's a matter of having any amount of standards for what's being released. if we're going by "community created" outfits then go by the ones that the community actually voted for. even in a vacuum of naming it "community created" it doesn't make any sense how some of these outfits were added since it's pretty obvious that the community do not agree with these choices.

    • Like 2

  6. 1 hour ago, LuzExtinguido said:

    Meh i will try once more, i wont make drawings because paint is awful 😜

     

    OPGL equiped:

    Not center dot:

    -Sprint

    -stop

    -crosshair appears

    -aim

    -fire

     

    Center dot:

    -sprint and aim

    -fire

     

    What looks like shorter for you?

    i've only started playing the game more from like 3 - 4 years of basically not touching the game and even i know that if you actually stop, aim with the crosshair and fire with an OPGL then you're probably not that proficient with it anyways. you get more momentum from sprint shoot-jumping and if you don't have a dot then you simply just know where you aim. if you have 8000 hours in the game, then you should know where the center of your screen is without a dot, if not then i think you should genuinely recuse yourself from the discussion altogether because you're not at liberty to talk about anything in-game related. if you know all these things, then it's a terrible example and you have no clue what you're actually trying to say.

     

    .ini fixes does not produce better players, it provides a smoother experience in a game that desperately needs it.


  7. or you can realize that it's just a word and it's meaning literally only gets power as long as you get offended by someone scrambling letters together and creating the dreaded "N-word".

    "b-but this word has h-history!!"

    okay, but i am roughly 98.5% certain none of that history applies to anybody playing this game, so why get bothered by it. use /ignore and move on.

     

    • Thanks 1

  8. 1 hour ago, TheAceNinja said:

    Also, the post earlier saying "The only counter to an HVR is another HVR" clearly doesn't understand the game mechanics enough. HVR's get beat out (At range) by Obeyas, Ntecs, even Stars quite often. It's not hard, adapt. Don't try to fight a sniper head on who has cover. That should literally be Rule #1. SMH

    That's assuming the Obeya/HVR are just sitting in the open. HVR wins at range if the HVR has any cover. It's taking into account any hypothetical situations - HVR has generally been seen as only TRULY counterable by another HVR simply because it's the only weapon able to pull out the amount of damage in that short span of time. Forcing a stalemate.

    At mid-long range with favorable set-up and all that, sure, those weapons aside from the STAR counter an HVR. But these days, you're not gonna find a HVR that's either not QSing or out of cover. Not to mention, that's not even taking into account the enemy team outside of the HVR - or more HVRs.

    I mean, my personal go-to counter to the HVR has always been a brick in the face since they usually don't see it coming but I'm always laughed at by my team for using them. Yet it keeps giving consistent results.


  9. 24 minutes ago, TR0Nx said:

    so... most games sniper is 1 hit..people could complain about stabba..how long it takes to respawn after geting hit.. end of the day i dont think anything about weapons should be messed with... just add hack shield...add new mission maps..new game mode..""""plz not battle royle""" 

    In most other games, the respawn process don't take nearly 20 seconds and usually puts you in a pretty bad position if your car spawner's blocked which is why 1 hit kill is more alright there. Here, it becomes a 50/50 situation where you either get hit and rushed by a teammate of theirs, or you get hit and you are literally forced to sit and wait until you've regen'd your health because in a lot of cases it's really not precise when you can run out again after an HVR hit outside of the full-health sound. Therein lies the issue, you're forced to effectively be a waste to your team until you can move again or hope that you support from low health. But if it's the case of a takeout mission then you really can't afford to hope to support with low health, you're pretty much forced to just sit down and wait. That's assuming the HVR lad wasn't close enough to throw nades at you now, or a flanking teammate of his.

     

    I already know who you are, and I know that you've stated that you've pretty much never played any other weapon than snipers, so I'd say you have a heavy bias on this subject. At least feel like that's worth mentioning to understand your point of view. The HVR has been complained about for as long as I've played the game and I'm on my seventh year now - yet I'm not even close to being as old as some other nerds here and they've all said people have always complained about the HVR, pretty much.


  10. 1 minute ago, TR0Nx said:

    all this hate on snipers...i dont get why..noone seems to mind rocket noobs an OPGl spamers..comeon stop going on about weapons being OP an so ..just cuz new people have taken over dont keep trying to change things just cuz u dont like it..learn to do it yourself or become a sniper..

    Difference is, you can hear the rockets and dodge them preemptively, OPGL requires a fair bit of understanding how to use grenade bounce to use well in a higher skill scenario. HVR is the fact that you plant your patootie on a corner and pop out for a millisecond and you've hit someone for 850 damage and now you can sneeze at them and they'll die. Not to mention it has incredibly accuracy in close quarters from the hip, you can QS with it and so on. Snipers as a whole aren't the issue, the N-HVR is. It's oppressive and the only real counter to a HVR is another HVR and that's not how game design works.


  11. 11 minutes ago, Freewind said:

     

    I can see where the concern lies, but I'm not talking anything serious. It'd be a special kind of bloom that's separate from the recoil bloom mechanics. All that would happen is that if you immediately shot it wouldn't be accurate. You'd only have to wait a second/half second to get full accuracy back. You could even make it apply exclusively to snipers, though that would be a bit unfair.

    I don't think you understand how extensive a small change like that would be. It would make the weaker guns weaker, since you now have less mobility with them to dip and dodge and hope for the best while barely scratching the better guns since guns like the N-Tec don't even care if you're jumping around a corner with decent accuracy in CQC. You fix the hitbox/hit reg issue rather than add some weird mechanic that'd change the fundamentals of the gunplay.

×
×
  • Create New...