Jump to content
Forum rules

ittibitium

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    388

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by ittibitium

  4. Posted

    1 hour ago, Mitne said:

    Account merge? How about no? What if some people like me hold two accounts for certain purposes? (Normal/Casual plays)

    Not even gonna tell that will be throwing my money in mud without my agreement (Account-wide gun purchased twice on both accounts etc.)

     

    I have just one question to OP and everyone supporting them... why YOU have multiple accounts and WHY suddenly you all want them merged? Smells fishy in here as hell.

    I got 2, had one banned around 2014 and the other one is my main. I want it cause I‘d like all my chars on one account, if you do not want to merge your two accounts don’t do it, if it comes it will certainly be optional

  7. Posted

    36 minutes ago, LilyV3 said:

     

    When they merged Innova into the G1 Accounts my Innova char was going to my g1 account actually.

     

    so it is definitely possible 🤔 

     

    11 minutes ago, CookiePuss said:

    I doubt it, but im also willing to pay for the option to do so.

    same here, ready to pay the fees 

    • Like 1

  13. Posted · Edited by ittibitium

    2 minutes ago, (PS4)grunge76 said:

    If we're on 3.5 why are there graphics issues since Halloween Event 2017, thanks to Gamersfirst... AND why is LO disinterested in fixing the graphics issues?

    idk, I don’t play on consoles nor do I know about the bugs/issues you guys are encountering. All i know is you guys are on 3.5 since launch 

  14. Posted

    4 hours ago, UubeNubeh DaWog said:

    For the sake of the argument lets say i have experienced both sides and i still hold the same positions, because you still have to substantiate your opinions and claims

     

    Now can you translate what you've said into any of the questions i've laid out before? Im looking forward to seeing the differences between two people who have had the same experiences but came to different conclusions.

     

    The whole point of "debating" is having the most logically sound argument, its not always a competition of who can remember the most correct answers. It is possible to use good logical reasoning to reach a sound conclusion regardless of when you know the relevant information.

    When i ask you a question im questioning how sound your argument is. Im not asking you a question about something that is not understood.

     

    I was very clear differentiating where the harm can come from. You don't have to cheat to understand the difference between playing a game and gaming as a whole.

     

    No one is claiming that cheating is the biggest issue to plague the industry (lets be real some people are), however just because its not taking over 50% of the industry does not mean it causes an acceptable amount of damage.

     

    Because you're begging the question, you have already said that you know that your personal amount of harm dealt is minimal, and yet you will not substantiate as to how you would know this. Its YOUR claim that your time as a cheater had no effect or caused "minimal" damage (community or industry wise). When the cheating industry as a whole (your time included) has been documented to have a large effect on the gaming industry that means that everything (your time included again) adds up and you cant add up with 0's.

    Talk about not having an informational basis.

     

    love how you tirelessly try to have an logical argument with that dude.

    never have I seen such a lack of thorough-thinking & empathy for different perspectives. I wouldn‘t want to waste time with him, glad you are doing it for us, hopefully he is capable of understanding 😂

  15. Posted

    5 minutes ago, (PS4)grunge76 said:

    No decrease or increase in performance?  So this isn't the transfer to Unreal Engine 3.5?  I'm getting tired of blurry, messed up graphics 50% of the time on PS4.  I'd like to see an improvement after such a long maintenance..... and now a year after LO purchased the game.....

    You guys are already on 3.5, the Engine Upgrade is referred to PC

  17. Posted

    22 minutes ago, illgot said:

    What about the OSCAR is p2w?  The third slot which is found on Armas versus the 2 slot contact unlock?  Do you believe that third slot is p2w?

     

    The only way I can see someone arguing the OSCAR is p2w is if they see a cheater using a bot and think the weapon is naturally superior over other weapons in the game.  That third slot certainly isn't going to make a player go from average to god like with aim.

    I am talking about your cheater = P2W argument. Most idiotic statement I‘ve heard. Unfortunately that logic is so flawful I won‘t explain it to you in detail, hence why I asked you to re-evaluate yourself.

    & no, OSCAR is not P2W, in no way.

  18. Posted

    5 hours ago, illgot said:

    The gun is only P2W if someone is using an aimbot or triggerbot.

    I am getting serious migraine by some comments on here. I want to ask you to re-read and re-evaluate what you wrote. 

    Can‘t be serious with that logic, am I right? 

  20. Posted · Edited by ittibitium

    4 hours ago, TheMessiah said:

    dat

    3.5 must be 1st man..nobody cares about riot

    You aren‘t able to view from another perspective are you? A pre-season of RIOT is essential, imagine this as a big test run, to gather bunch of feedback & more. Season 1 is going to be the finetuned version of RIOT launching with Engine Upgrade and the marketing plan.

    Now I get you, I do, I anticipate 3.5 aswell and egoistically want it to be here asap, but it is better to launch them simultaniously, as in... would you go into a game, find out it has a variety of gamemodes (referring to RIOT) just to hop in and realise it‘s not really polished and not a lot of fun? As soon as marketing starts for this game, everything has to be as perfect as can be, considering the critical state of it. Adding RIOT later on without it being catered to the needs of players would be fatal. 

    my 2cents.

  21. Posted

    4 minutes ago, Goldtiger said:

    I don't think there should be fixed prices on anything related to legendary weapons. What I would like to see though, is the ability to trade/sell rare daily activity weapons. I don't understand why only legendary weapons can be traded/sold. like wat

     

    agreed, so much. gives people who do not want to wait for activities a chance to get one and those whom got multiples to sell them. 

    • Like 2

  24. Posted

    3 hours ago, Darkzero3802 said:

    Just to repeat myself. Asking ppl nicely who already won not to repeat win isnt working, you have ppl who have won 22 times already. Unless the GMs start using force to remove these ppl repeat wins are going to be the standard of this event (which it already is)

    holy shit dude we got it. 

    LO got it aswell, Matt acknowledged it.

    You repeating it a thousand times daily is unneccessary, albeit I do get your frustration.

    • Thanks 1
×
×
  • Create New...