Jump to content

Dead_Game

Members
  • Content Count

    196
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Dead_Game

  1. again we are coming to the original argument as the loop ends here , LO is not prioritizing this violation. How many times you report the same people , these reports do not matter cause as of today LO has no way of checking this . LO do not bat an eye nor the current anti-cheat system can detect these custom configs . Many of the streamers have [ removed effects_ particle , explosions effect ( the explosions effect cannot be seen on the client UI) , disable muzzle-flash etc.] So either you are just closing ur eyes or u must be using these as well , which are against allowed config limits. Some even have custom cross-hair from the shader config edit lol Sakebee disliking this wont hide the truth. Next time come dislike this being anonymous LOL
  2. there is no penalties, if there was, half or more than half of the apb streamer would be penalized for it and would only exist few "skilled players" in apb. Why kill the remaining population right ?
  3. Yes this is exactly what I was bringing up , LO should make it clear on those edits if not this is so unbalanced.
  4. you seems to be defending deeper config edits further than what Advance APB Launcher provides. It is considered cheating if those edits are giving advantage over regular players who plays apb. Streaming with it seems to rub off the fact that LO doesn't bat an eye since "those skills" seems to grab some viewers and all they care about is marketing , yet except some new players every old player out there knows this is a clear cut advantage over when playing apb. So they should take action against these "skilled players" if not they should implement scans of config files if the edits mismatches from the allowed configs out there. Using an actual cheat is even worse but this is no better lol.
  5. when you balance out the reports , its evident that LO priorities banning griefers, violation of terms of service with names/symbols . Yet the closets wont even get checked , this includes custom configs for apb reloaded which eliminates grenade effects, custom environmental edits I am not gonna mention details of it since its not my job to find exploits , all they need to do a quick inevitable scan of all the files with line by line to find the edits and ban'em. Yet this is excused and misused by so called "skilled players", you are definitely editing further than what advance APB Launcher provides and seems like its a good closet spot for these cheaters. As Long as they exist , none of the reports matter and you are not getting rid of cheaters.
  6. I never pressured but thank you for adding me in that category. I was showing my criticism to the rushed beta as clearly it was unfinished, yes It was meant to be harsh, sorry I hate polish talks when it comes to garbage presentation. "Porting to 3.5 to 4 is gonna be easier" just a theory at the moment , based on history its gonna be like this EU. I do have alternative suggestions but based on current LO budget , I doubt they can even do that. Addition to my 2nd point , if LO thinks its gonna grab enough revenue for the next engine transition from this EU , it is definitely a wrong prediction. New players (majority) never gonna stick for long time as matchmaking is broken , all I heard/ read was players will be matched with players with same or similar latency. Better than EU V3 is the only Pro with this EU in a core perspective , there are other factors in Pro but It do not seems relevant to the game mechanism. Not even close to war with the world, just tired of the end loop of EU that is not gonna bring any significant change to even present it to others. With this I am concluding my replies and APB Reloaded:
  7. Again who are you calling silvers LOL , is that suppose to be an insult or is it so that , you representing that you are that part of toxicity that seems to think broken threat recognition defines something ? As long as we do not address the toxic attitude of players like you ,looking down on threats , this game is not gonna magically grab new players. "Tracking the Engine Update"is good to read but yet to experience to see if it fits with the notes LOL . So do you prefer reading notes of EU development or actually experiencing it first hand basis? 64-bit transition is necessary but that wont cover the new EU becoming outdated as 3.5 version is gonna be primitive soon enough, for the time being it will be a upscale to the current dead engine but its not gonna be enough very soon . "Early Access" mostly are Alpha/pre-Alpha.
  8. ok new territory. Except DayZ SA, point out some examples with a beta being this awful ? I do play many games which has less budget than APB and some which had 10 -100 times bigger budget than APB lol . Most of those games have at least 200% of Apb player base. So comparing them is like comparing an elephant and a peanut. I do though but It is nice that we have smart guys like you who are still waiting for "a soon to be Outdated EU".
  9. This was an alpha test at most. Its an insult to call this unfinished pile of crap Beta. Beta is something close to be released in full.
  10. Yes of course. You seems to be still biting on the "stress test " but today's failure seems like it sliced the remaining pop who had hope on EU expectation to half or even less. I was not expecting much to begin with. The fact that they decided to copy current database to the beta was a huge step and expected to fail from there itself (Usually that is the last step).At least LO can count you in the remaining pop cause I am officially done. By the time they release a decent EU , the Unreal Engine will be Outdated so that it will be essential for another EU.
  11. oh I do , but in fact I am done accepting bs reasoning , not gonna swallow it anymore. Yes both are different , but this was not a stress test, if it was they have done a worst job in history of stress testing not anticipating the pop count max limit from current APB. And never in the announcement it was said "stress test". But we can make bs for every failure .
  12. This would make sense if you implying a performance issue. Its not more bs, keep them coming
  13. Right. If that was the case current APB would face the same issue , but its not. You cannot tell me that they did not anticipate it from current APB build LOL. Please I like to hear more bs.
  14. its not like they could not predict the stress(POP) from current apb population LOL . You keep saying "expecting a finished product" , this is not even a beta. This was just beating the bushes. STOP CALLING THIS STRESS TEST
  15. all I saw was less than 150 ppl who actually got in , guess there was a cap for the open beta which you guys failed to mention. The uninstall worked perfect though , there was no cap there
  16. open beta servers trying to join :
  17. almost 1 hr past in and its just waste of time Open Beta
  18. nice to hear them words , I like to see that in practical. Also should not call it an engine upgrade, that is a false term for it, from your words I would rename it to foundation update. The whole point was this upgrade should not be called Engine Upgrade. Again except some veteran players and some newbies hopefully not discouraged by the present poor matchmaking system would only stick around that long for an actual EU if its gonna be delayed further. And you must be blind if you only see gif.
  19. The engine upgrade was pushed back and RIOT mode was released initially caused the super delay. But let us move that aside , Matt wants to get out what ? what are we gonna get with 3.5 EU basically "POOP" what they call is hardwork but in reality poor prioritization of tasks. Starting point of what ? More delays ? lol . This is not even an EU upgrade then , should not call it EU if they are just patching up G1 trash. So to summarize this is just patch that is over hyped and nothing else. Starting point more delays and unrealistic goals. If they have chunk to spend with nothing in return this is the best way to go. I seriously doubt except some streamers and veteran players that stick on to this garbage would be enough to pay for their coders LOL. Nice take on the name
  20. I can bet on the fact that its POOP , all I see is advertising social district which is irrelevant , has LO or anyone tested , posted an actual video of how it performs when on missions? oh yeah Nothing. I wont buy that at all. you can call me Jackass , but when they release that shit and dont live up to the hype come back to this. I was not expecting a patched up G1 material lol. This is patched up G1 material. In other words LO did nothing to change except work on some aspect of performance which I seriously doubt considering the fact that none of the demos shows an actual mission video of performance rather some screenshots of console version UIs lol and of course social LOL.
  21. Console version is a failure . So in other words they are trying to patch that failure and call it EU. oh yeah big upgrade from 3 to 3.5. or its just
×
×
  • Create New...