Also relevant to the neutrino stuff:
the problem with this critique on the faster-than-light-neutrino is a bit stupid in my opinion. one of the results of the fact that if these neutrinos are really faster than light is that current physiscs are incorrect. using an argument from that very physics theory to discredit the results is a bit odd.
it's like you know the alibi of the killer to be wrong and that indeed mister X is the killer but his lawyer still insists claims innocence based on the alibi that has been falsified.
if our current theory is wrong on lightspeed being the maximum possible, it is also likely to be wrong on the idea that the neutrino MUST lose energy (it actually isn't as bremsstrahlung makes particles change kinetic energy to photons (light) )this would even more so be the case if the bremsstrahlung-theory were (partially) based on Einstein's ideas on lightspeed.
that said i'd find it amazing if these neutrinos were really faster than light...but again, Newtonian physics were supplanted by Einstein and Einstein bymodern physics without being actually totally wrong. it's likely that the speed of light rules still stands except for some rare cases like neutrinos.